Tweet
SYRIA'S WAR HAS EXPOSED THE HYPOCRISY OF WESTERN POWERS
The conflict has become an ugly proxy battle between innumerable
outside forces. If the Australian government is so worried about
terrorism, it should stop backing it in Syria
By Antony Loewenstein
August 14, 2013 "Information Clearing House - "The Guardian" - Syrian
president Bashar al-Assad wasn't supposed to survive. Since the
uprising began in 2011, it's been long presumed in western political
and media circles that he would be deposed or killed and that a new,
more US-friendly autocrat would be installed. This hasn't happened.
We know Russia and America have vastly different interests in the
conflict. As for Australia, foreign minister Bob Carr predictably
parroted the Washington line in October 2012 when he said, "this sounds
brutal and callous, perhaps an assassination [of Assad] combined with
a major defection, taking a large part of its military, is what is
required to get ... a ceasefire and two, political negotiations".
Carr was rightly condemned for his comments, yet he ignored another
harsh reality: when it comes to Syria, the US and its Saudi Arabian
and Qatari allies are backing Islamic fundamentalism under the guise
of defeating the west's key Middle East villain, Iran. Al-Qaida is
now thriving, and the number of beheadings and other assorted acts
of extreme sectarian violence have been steadily rising. It's like
the funding of the Mujahideen in Afghanistan never happened, or that
the lessons learned after the west armed what became al-Qaida under
Osama Bin Laden were wiped from the record.
By June this year, Carr accepted the necessary presence of Assad in any
successful peace negotiations. Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman
Julie Bishop urged for a "negotiated settlement" in February, but
refused to condemn the role of western-backed jihadis.
Meanwhile, foreign fighters are flooding into Syria - and they've
become some of the fiercest and most successful insurgents against the
Assad regime. US officials talk of the country becoming an extremist
haven. Blue-eyed jihadists from Europe recently told Foreign Policy
that they were committed to establishing an Islamic state inside the
nation. Abu Salman (not his real name) said that, "They [the United
States] only give weapons to the worst groups ... These groups operate
inside the Free Syrian Army, but they even don't fight for democracy,
they just steal money".
At least a few hundred Australians are involved, causing growing
sectarianism in Sydney between Sunni and Shia communities. I've spoken
to many local Muslims who say the blindness being displayed on both
sides - Assad backers ignoring the vast crimes perpetuated by his
forces and rebel backers denying the extent of hardline Islamist
support - is fuelling resentment and violence on the streets and
online.
I've attended events where the estimated death toll of over 100,000
Syrians and immense refugee crisis engulfing neighbouring countries
is mostly forgotten amidst the conflicting visions of a future Syria
without war. The Syrian diaspora is fragmenting along lines that their
birth country never experienced. Syrians pushing for the overthrow
of Assad are often as belligerent as his loudest advocates, willing
to ignore the war crimes committed by their own side. Like we see
daily in Iraq, rampant sectarianism fuelled by outside forces only
leads to chaos.
Tammam Sulaiman, the former Syrian ambassador to Australia, now
Damascus-based senior member of Assad's foreign ministry and soon to
be head of mission at the Syrian embassy in Pyongyang in North Korea,
told me last week in an exclusive interview that he didn't understand
why the west remained silent when "rebel terrorism" was committed. He
acknowledged that the regime had made "mistakes", but stressed his
government was determined to win. "Our general impression is that
the battle will not finish soon", he said.
I pushed him on human rights reports that found regime forces were
slaughtering civilians. "The US talks about collateral damage", he
argued. "The US coined that term and what we're doing is the same. We
don't want to kill civilians. They started the war."
In fact, I told Sulaiman, there were peaceful protests in Daraa in
March 2011, and these were brutally crushed by Assad forces. How
could the regime talk about democracy when civilians were tortured
and killed by pro-government soldiers?
Sulaiman had little to say about this question. And yet, he correctly
said, the war in Syria has exposed the hypocrisy of the western
powers. "Those western officials, including in Australia, don't say
anything because they'll upset their allies in Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
I recently said to a representative from the Vatican here in Damascus,
'I can't understand why Catholic Europe is standing up behind Saudi
Arabia, and yet no Christian can stand in Riyadh with a beer. The
Vatican man smiled and responded by saying nothing'".
This is the kind of ugly truth the western media is too keen to ignore,
rushing to repeat US, UK and Australian talking points about a regime
that for decades has refused to bow to western dictates - the ultimate
sin of which Tehran is also guilty of.
The war in Syria has become an ugly proxy battle between innumerable
outside forces, and virtually none of them care about the plight of
the Syrian people. The announcement by the Assad regime that private
security firms can now operate inside the nation is yet another
ominous sign that unaccountable terror will be roaming the streets.
Australia can play a small but significant part by looking clearly at
the failures of western policy towards Syria since the first rumblings
of major public dissent against the regime. Canberra should urge all
parties to de-escalate the fighting and not arm, train or fund either
side. If the Australian government is so worried about terrorism on
its shores, it should stop backing it in Syria.
© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited
The conflict has become an ugly proxy battle between innumerable
outside forces. If the Australian government is so worried about
terrorism, it should stop backing it in Syria
By Antony Loewenstein
August 14, 2013 "Information Clearing House - "The Guardian" - Syrian
president Bashar al-Assad wasn't supposed to survive. Since the
uprising began in 2011, it's been long presumed in western political
and media circles that he would be deposed or killed and that a new,
more US-friendly autocrat would be installed. This hasn't happened.
We know Russia and America have vastly different interests in the
conflict. As for Australia, foreign minister Bob Carr predictably
parroted the Washington line in October 2012 when he said, "this sounds
brutal and callous, perhaps an assassination [of Assad] combined with
a major defection, taking a large part of its military, is what is
required to get ... a ceasefire and two, political negotiations".
Carr was rightly condemned for his comments, yet he ignored another
harsh reality: when it comes to Syria, the US and its Saudi Arabian
and Qatari allies are backing Islamic fundamentalism under the guise
of defeating the west's key Middle East villain, Iran. Al-Qaida is
now thriving, and the number of beheadings and other assorted acts
of extreme sectarian violence have been steadily rising. It's like
the funding of the Mujahideen in Afghanistan never happened, or that
the lessons learned after the west armed what became al-Qaida under
Osama Bin Laden were wiped from the record.
By June this year, Carr accepted the necessary presence of Assad in any
successful peace negotiations. Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman
Julie Bishop urged for a "negotiated settlement" in February, but
refused to condemn the role of western-backed jihadis.
Meanwhile, foreign fighters are flooding into Syria - and they've
become some of the fiercest and most successful insurgents against the
Assad regime. US officials talk of the country becoming an extremist
haven. Blue-eyed jihadists from Europe recently told Foreign Policy
that they were committed to establishing an Islamic state inside the
nation. Abu Salman (not his real name) said that, "They [the United
States] only give weapons to the worst groups ... These groups operate
inside the Free Syrian Army, but they even don't fight for democracy,
they just steal money".
At least a few hundred Australians are involved, causing growing
sectarianism in Sydney between Sunni and Shia communities. I've spoken
to many local Muslims who say the blindness being displayed on both
sides - Assad backers ignoring the vast crimes perpetuated by his
forces and rebel backers denying the extent of hardline Islamist
support - is fuelling resentment and violence on the streets and
online.
I've attended events where the estimated death toll of over 100,000
Syrians and immense refugee crisis engulfing neighbouring countries
is mostly forgotten amidst the conflicting visions of a future Syria
without war. The Syrian diaspora is fragmenting along lines that their
birth country never experienced. Syrians pushing for the overthrow
of Assad are often as belligerent as his loudest advocates, willing
to ignore the war crimes committed by their own side. Like we see
daily in Iraq, rampant sectarianism fuelled by outside forces only
leads to chaos.
Tammam Sulaiman, the former Syrian ambassador to Australia, now
Damascus-based senior member of Assad's foreign ministry and soon to
be head of mission at the Syrian embassy in Pyongyang in North Korea,
told me last week in an exclusive interview that he didn't understand
why the west remained silent when "rebel terrorism" was committed. He
acknowledged that the regime had made "mistakes", but stressed his
government was determined to win. "Our general impression is that
the battle will not finish soon", he said.
I pushed him on human rights reports that found regime forces were
slaughtering civilians. "The US talks about collateral damage", he
argued. "The US coined that term and what we're doing is the same. We
don't want to kill civilians. They started the war."
In fact, I told Sulaiman, there were peaceful protests in Daraa in
March 2011, and these were brutally crushed by Assad forces. How
could the regime talk about democracy when civilians were tortured
and killed by pro-government soldiers?
Sulaiman had little to say about this question. And yet, he correctly
said, the war in Syria has exposed the hypocrisy of the western
powers. "Those western officials, including in Australia, don't say
anything because they'll upset their allies in Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
I recently said to a representative from the Vatican here in Damascus,
'I can't understand why Catholic Europe is standing up behind Saudi
Arabia, and yet no Christian can stand in Riyadh with a beer. The
Vatican man smiled and responded by saying nothing'".
This is the kind of ugly truth the western media is too keen to ignore,
rushing to repeat US, UK and Australian talking points about a regime
that for decades has refused to bow to western dictates - the ultimate
sin of which Tehran is also guilty of.
The war in Syria has become an ugly proxy battle between innumerable
outside forces, and virtually none of them care about the plight of
the Syrian people. The announcement by the Assad regime that private
security firms can now operate inside the nation is yet another
ominous sign that unaccountable terror will be roaming the streets.
Australia can play a small but significant part by looking clearly at
the failures of western policy towards Syria since the first rumblings
of major public dissent against the regime. Canberra should urge all
parties to de-escalate the fighting and not arm, train or fund either
side. If the Australian government is so worried about terrorism on
its shores, it should stop backing it in Syria.
© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited