Tweet
"ZURABYAN-OSKANYAN", "EDIK MINASYAN" "OPERATIONS": THE CONSTITUTIONAL NORM IS VIOLATED IN BOTH CASES
http://lurer.com/?p=67879&l=en
2013-01-10 17:11:25
A few days ago a record was widely used in the press, which was made
in the post-election period, when the Dean of YSU History Faculty
Edik Minasyan told the students that if one of them or the lecturers
participated in the demonstrations, he would be removed from the
university.
And to the question of one of the students: "Is it my constitutional
right?" Minasyan said: "What is a constitutional right?".
Lurer.com talked about this with Edik Minasyan, who described the
record as an organized provocation.
Intense discussions around the record began in Facebook,too. All
accused Dean of articulated thoughts and described it as a restriction
of freedom of rights and violation of constitutional order.
If even consider the fact that the sounded words in the record is
really a gross violation of the Constitution, however, it is a gross
violation of the collection, storage and dissemination of information
without the knowledge or consent individual, if it is inconsistent
with the objective of collecting information or required by law.
Just a month ago, when the Internet added wiretapping private meeting
of the Parliamentary Leader of the Armenian National Congress Levon
Zurabyan and former Minister of Foreign Affairs, the deputy from the
party of "Prosperous Armenia" Oskanyan, everyone started talking about
it taht it was a violation of the constitutional and criminal law,
refused to comment on the main conversation and turned to tapping.
Nevertheless, the Dean's record is on the Internet, and discussions
are ongoing. Merely clear: in both cases there was a gross violation
of constitutional norms. Let us, and this time do not apply to ideas
voiced in the record, thus showing respect for the Constitution.
Note that the 23rd article of the Constitution states: "The collection,
storage, use and dissemination of information about the private life
of a person without his or her consent is not permitted."
And the 142nd article of the Criminal Code provides: "Everyone has
the right of privacy of correspondence, telephone conversations,
postal, telegraph and other messages. A limitation of this right can
be allowed only by court order. "
Gayane Hambardzumyan
http://lurer.com/?p=67879&l=en
2013-01-10 17:11:25
A few days ago a record was widely used in the press, which was made
in the post-election period, when the Dean of YSU History Faculty
Edik Minasyan told the students that if one of them or the lecturers
participated in the demonstrations, he would be removed from the
university.
And to the question of one of the students: "Is it my constitutional
right?" Minasyan said: "What is a constitutional right?".
Lurer.com talked about this with Edik Minasyan, who described the
record as an organized provocation.
Intense discussions around the record began in Facebook,too. All
accused Dean of articulated thoughts and described it as a restriction
of freedom of rights and violation of constitutional order.
If even consider the fact that the sounded words in the record is
really a gross violation of the Constitution, however, it is a gross
violation of the collection, storage and dissemination of information
without the knowledge or consent individual, if it is inconsistent
with the objective of collecting information or required by law.
Just a month ago, when the Internet added wiretapping private meeting
of the Parliamentary Leader of the Armenian National Congress Levon
Zurabyan and former Minister of Foreign Affairs, the deputy from the
party of "Prosperous Armenia" Oskanyan, everyone started talking about
it taht it was a violation of the constitutional and criminal law,
refused to comment on the main conversation and turned to tapping.
Nevertheless, the Dean's record is on the Internet, and discussions
are ongoing. Merely clear: in both cases there was a gross violation
of constitutional norms. Let us, and this time do not apply to ideas
voiced in the record, thus showing respect for the Constitution.
Note that the 23rd article of the Constitution states: "The collection,
storage, use and dissemination of information about the private life
of a person without his or her consent is not permitted."
And the 142nd article of the Criminal Code provides: "Everyone has
the right of privacy of correspondence, telephone conversations,
postal, telegraph and other messages. A limitation of this right can
be allowed only by court order. "
Gayane Hambardzumyan