DISSOLUTION OF PARLIAMENT IS BECOMING REAL
Naira Hayrumyan
13:35 27/03/2013
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/country/view/29426
Film director Vahram Martirosyan posted on his Facebook that the less
amount of people is in the square, the more evident Serzh Sargsyan's
readiness to concessions becomes.
The situation is quite strange: Serzh Sargsyan's supporters say
in a loud voice that they are not going to positions yield to
the opposition, that only amateurs are in the oppositional rows,
and Serzh Sargsyan "unexpectedly" agrees to discuss the "immature"
proposals by Raffi. In addition, Parliament agreed to create not
only a commission to study the events of 1 March, but even to call
an extraordinary meeting to pass a resolution on the elections.
Can we affirm that Serzh Sargsyan is going yield to the opposition
despite the opinion of his supporters? If he is, then we should assume
that he may force the parliament to resign during the extraordinary
session which should be held before April 9. And if Serzh Sargsyan
possesses information that on April 9 the opposition will bring to
streets a critical mass of people, then he will be ready to sacrifice
the parliament.
Perhaps, Serzh Sargsyan has information that not only Raffi Hovannisian
and the square demand the dissolution of the parliament, but also
a number of world centers. No accident, the main proposals of the
Armenian National Congress within the frameworks of working out of
the statement, are the presidential and parliamentary elections.
Perhaps, Congress found out that Serzh Sargsyan may dissolve the
parliament anyway.
Serzh Sargsyan does not need his current team which slows any
development. This team, not only in the face of the Republican
Party, but also the "alternative" Prosperous Armenia and "radical"
Armenian National Congress, as if is especially all assembled in the
parliament. The dissolution of parliament may allow getting rid of
everyone at once. Moreover, if Serzh Sargsyan receives in exchange
guarantees on the recognition of his legitimacy.
Naira Hayrumyan
13:35 27/03/2013
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/country/view/29426
Film director Vahram Martirosyan posted on his Facebook that the less
amount of people is in the square, the more evident Serzh Sargsyan's
readiness to concessions becomes.
The situation is quite strange: Serzh Sargsyan's supporters say
in a loud voice that they are not going to positions yield to
the opposition, that only amateurs are in the oppositional rows,
and Serzh Sargsyan "unexpectedly" agrees to discuss the "immature"
proposals by Raffi. In addition, Parliament agreed to create not
only a commission to study the events of 1 March, but even to call
an extraordinary meeting to pass a resolution on the elections.
Can we affirm that Serzh Sargsyan is going yield to the opposition
despite the opinion of his supporters? If he is, then we should assume
that he may force the parliament to resign during the extraordinary
session which should be held before April 9. And if Serzh Sargsyan
possesses information that on April 9 the opposition will bring to
streets a critical mass of people, then he will be ready to sacrifice
the parliament.
Perhaps, Serzh Sargsyan has information that not only Raffi Hovannisian
and the square demand the dissolution of the parliament, but also
a number of world centers. No accident, the main proposals of the
Armenian National Congress within the frameworks of working out of
the statement, are the presidential and parliamentary elections.
Perhaps, Congress found out that Serzh Sargsyan may dissolve the
parliament anyway.
Serzh Sargsyan does not need his current team which slows any
development. This team, not only in the face of the Republican
Party, but also the "alternative" Prosperous Armenia and "radical"
Armenian National Congress, as if is especially all assembled in the
parliament. The dissolution of parliament may allow getting rid of
everyone at once. Moreover, if Serzh Sargsyan receives in exchange
guarantees on the recognition of his legitimacy.