Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'Confusion and inconsistencies': How US plans to distract public fro

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 'Confusion and inconsistencies': How US plans to distract public fro

    'Confusion and inconsistencies': How US plans to distract public from
    real truth about Boston

    RT.com
    April 21, 2013

    The initial questions about the Boston bombing are behind us, but
    former FBI employee Sibel Edmonds believes the pursuit of truth will
    eventually lead to a far more secret agenda by the US, which she
    reveals to RT.

    The United States is having to quickly wake up to the possibility that
    Chechens are not the `freedom fighters' Western media has been
    categorizing them as, especially when it came to the Republic's
    relationship to Russia. But even the newly formed perceptions may not
    be enough when it comes to investigating the motives and planning
    behind the Boston bombing, according to Edmonds, who is also a founder
    of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition.

    With the dust somewhat settled after the capture of the younger
    suspect, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Edmonds believes there will only be more
    unanswered questions in an investigation already plagued by obvious
    inconsistencies and falsities, which she recounts at length.

    RT: We've learned in the last hour that Russia warned the FBI about
    the older Tsarnaev brother and his potential links with radical
    Islamists, but the FBI found nothing suspicious. How is that possible?

    Sibel Edmonds: Actually, we predicted that the unnamed foreign country
    [Western media didn't name the source immediately] was in fact Russia,
    two days ago. We have too little facts, too much false information and
    speculations. But just look at the period they are talking about. When
    you listen to the suspect's mother, she's talking about a period of
    three to five years. According to FBI officials, they received this
    information, this warning, in 2011. So we have that inconsistency
    right there. The other important inconsistency that we should pay
    attention to is the mother's description of FBI mannerisms and
    conversation with the suspects and the family when they were visiting
    them for the last three to five years. That fits exactly the
    recruitment style of the intelligence community. When you go to the
    suspects, and one moment you're saying `We know you're decent, we know
    you're doing nothing wrong, we know you're good', and the next minute
    they're saying `You can be dangerous', right after receiving that
    information from the Russian government, to threaten them with that
    information for what purpose - to recruit them as informants or for
    other agendas.

    RT: We spoke to the mother last night. She said there is no way on
    earth they could have been involved in a heinous crime like this, that
    she knew everything about them and they could not have been potential
    terrorists. However, could there be another side to these people that
    they didn't even let their mother know, is that not feasible?

    SE: Well, again, we don't have real information from our source in the
    last 48 hours. I found out that they had been associating the brothers
    - especially the older one =80` with very wealthy individual Turkish
    persons, some of them students in Boston, some businessmen...really
    modern people. And we haven't received any information that they [the
    brothers] had been associating with Chechens, even the radicals. So
    that itself is another major inconsistency in this story.

    RT: Similarities are being drawn between the 'pressure cooker' bombs
    used in Boston and those which Al Qaeda gets English-speaking
    terrorists to use. Just how much does this prove in terms of the
    bombers' links with the terrorist group?

    SE: Again, it's way too early to comment on this and I think that
    whole notion right now sounds really, really weak. Because the US
    government, when it is convenient, one minute talk about how
    sophisticated Al Qaeda has become - in fact they're as sophisticated
    as the NSA [US National Security Agency] - they are talking about
    their ability to obtain laptop, or suitcase bombs, nuclear bombs...and
    the next moment they are talking about this amateurish home-made
    ability. So, as far as the government is concerned, I think it's too
    early to buy this either from the US media or the government.

    This situation is really similar to the Bin Laden shooting. Every day
    the story changed. And this is what we are going to see in the next
    few days. They are going to change the story, they are going to throw
    so much confusion and inconsistencies and conflicting data that no one
    is going to figure out what actually happened, especially if the
    second suspect dies.

    RT: There's been a tendency in the Western media to portray armed
    groups in the Chechnya as freedom fighters. Is that going to change at
    all after this?

    SE: We all have to really look at the timing of this, because again
    the US media is portraying this incident by itself. It's not putting
    it in the context of things that have been happening in the past -
    let's say one year so - or recent stuff - we had this case of NGOs
    being shut down by the Russian government, which was a very smart
    move, because we know that the majority of these NGOs have CIA
    agendas, as they're operated and managed by CIA people. And this is
    one way of infiltrating Russia by the US government, the CIA.

    So, if you start putting these in context and also add the fact that
    Russia has been the biggest obstacle for the United States to get in
    and directly attack Syria - that's when you start to see the bigger
    picture and that's what the people should be paying attention
    to. Again, the false information that is being put forth by US media
    is that since the fall of the Soviet Union the United States has
    refrained from intervening in the Russia-Chechnya situation. And that
    is purely false. Since mid-1990's, the US directly, or through Turkey
    has been arming, training, managing, orchestrating not only Chechens
    but also other factions in the region - and we are looking at Central
    Asia and the Caucasus.


    The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely
    those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Working...
X