Tweet
RIMA DEMIRCHYAN HAS DISCLOSED THE CONVERSATION BETWEEN KOCHARYAN AND JHANGIRYAN AND THE WIVES OF OCTOBER 27 VICTIMS
October 4 2013
She considers Robert Kocharyan's explanation absurd that if Karen
Serobich did not get up and speak, he would not be killed The wife
of Yuri Bakhshyan, Anahit Bakhshyan, when in the interview with
"Aravot" was interpreting some sentences from Robert Kocharyan's
testimony, exposed an episode committed during that period with some
of the details. She told us what meeting was held in May 7, 2000 at
the Presidential between the wives of October 27 victims and Gagik
Jhangiryan and Robert Kocharyan, and what hard conversation was held.
During the meeting, Robert Kocharyan was flooded with questions,
especially by Karen Demirchyan's wife, Mrs. Rima Demirchyan. In the
interview with "Aravot", this time, Ms. Demirchyan revealed as to what
was talked about with Robert Kocharyan, and what "absurd" explanation
was provided by the latter regarding murdering of Karen Demirchyan.
"After October 27, we met once with him. In the general silence,
I spoke with him very sharply. Gagik Jhangiryan was there, at that
time he was the RA Attorney General, also his security staff and
us. He tried to explain that if Karen Serobich did not speak, did not
get up, he would not be killed. The wound on the leg was accidental;
the rest was the result of his improper behavior. Of course, it is
beyond rationality. Karen Serobich could not, he was not the type
of man to get under the table or the chair like MPs. But shooting
... such an explanation is absurd, because the orbit distinctly shows
in the picture that they fired on him, it was not enough, there was
a control shot. Why do you have to make a control shot on the dead,
this is the other brother. I tend to think that this explanation
was an absurd one. The main target over there was Karen Serobich,
therefore they come to NA, therefore they had left this left the
option that he was shot accidentally. For a long time this version
was still in force, but there is no accidental. They got in just for
him to shoot. Because they could shoot Vazgen in some other place, but
shooting Karen Demirchyan was not explained in any way. It was prepared
to say that it is an accidental. It did not work. When they wrapped up,
the prosecutor asked Kocharyan as to how finally to formulate this act,
he said, well, a coup, and so on. I said, no, it was not a coup. Coup?
The gun was left with the murderer, and Kocharyan had met him alone.
He could have shot Kocharian too, isn't it? It is not happen. If he
had destroyed all three branches, that would be a real coup. I said,
no, it was not a coup, it was a political murder. " During that
meeting, Robert Kocharyan also said that let Karen Demirchyan have
body guards. Mrs. Demirchyan commented, "What shall the guard do at
that moment? Vazgen had. Should Karen Serobich have, he was thinking
that presiding a session at the legislative body, National Assembly,
in the presence of armed people, is beyond ethic rules, beyond the
law. He would never let it happen. And Vazgen had also let his body
guards out. It's another matter that the building was not protected.
What the right did the outsiders, accidental people from the street
have to pass the gates and enter the building? Did they have the
right to? Random dregs. It was not, let's say, they were some kind of
officials, dregs, who freely passed and entered the hall. Was it to
happen? It was a very delicate and organized work." Ms. Demirchyan has
no doubts that Nairi Hunanyan's murdering weapons were entered into
the Parliament House in advance. "How could they pass them through
so many people? So, either the guards were their supporters or the
weapons were not passed through into the building like that, they
was passed before. As to who has organized it, it is difficult to say.
It's difficult, because there are such issues, including the
geopolitical redistribution. External forces also played a role here,
but it was done by the hands of Armenians. This is the most painful
part." Rima Demirchyan confirmed the testimony of Anahit Bakhshyan
that Gagik Jhangiryan had said, my hands are tied, they do not let
me work. "He has said the same to us. But why are they tied up? Let
him function. This case cannot stay unrevealed, it is disclosed."
Hripsime JEBEJYAN
Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2013/10/04/161884/
From: A. Papazian
October 4 2013
She considers Robert Kocharyan's explanation absurd that if Karen
Serobich did not get up and speak, he would not be killed The wife
of Yuri Bakhshyan, Anahit Bakhshyan, when in the interview with
"Aravot" was interpreting some sentences from Robert Kocharyan's
testimony, exposed an episode committed during that period with some
of the details. She told us what meeting was held in May 7, 2000 at
the Presidential between the wives of October 27 victims and Gagik
Jhangiryan and Robert Kocharyan, and what hard conversation was held.
During the meeting, Robert Kocharyan was flooded with questions,
especially by Karen Demirchyan's wife, Mrs. Rima Demirchyan. In the
interview with "Aravot", this time, Ms. Demirchyan revealed as to what
was talked about with Robert Kocharyan, and what "absurd" explanation
was provided by the latter regarding murdering of Karen Demirchyan.
"After October 27, we met once with him. In the general silence,
I spoke with him very sharply. Gagik Jhangiryan was there, at that
time he was the RA Attorney General, also his security staff and
us. He tried to explain that if Karen Serobich did not speak, did not
get up, he would not be killed. The wound on the leg was accidental;
the rest was the result of his improper behavior. Of course, it is
beyond rationality. Karen Serobich could not, he was not the type
of man to get under the table or the chair like MPs. But shooting
... such an explanation is absurd, because the orbit distinctly shows
in the picture that they fired on him, it was not enough, there was
a control shot. Why do you have to make a control shot on the dead,
this is the other brother. I tend to think that this explanation
was an absurd one. The main target over there was Karen Serobich,
therefore they come to NA, therefore they had left this left the
option that he was shot accidentally. For a long time this version
was still in force, but there is no accidental. They got in just for
him to shoot. Because they could shoot Vazgen in some other place, but
shooting Karen Demirchyan was not explained in any way. It was prepared
to say that it is an accidental. It did not work. When they wrapped up,
the prosecutor asked Kocharyan as to how finally to formulate this act,
he said, well, a coup, and so on. I said, no, it was not a coup. Coup?
The gun was left with the murderer, and Kocharyan had met him alone.
He could have shot Kocharian too, isn't it? It is not happen. If he
had destroyed all three branches, that would be a real coup. I said,
no, it was not a coup, it was a political murder. " During that
meeting, Robert Kocharyan also said that let Karen Demirchyan have
body guards. Mrs. Demirchyan commented, "What shall the guard do at
that moment? Vazgen had. Should Karen Serobich have, he was thinking
that presiding a session at the legislative body, National Assembly,
in the presence of armed people, is beyond ethic rules, beyond the
law. He would never let it happen. And Vazgen had also let his body
guards out. It's another matter that the building was not protected.
What the right did the outsiders, accidental people from the street
have to pass the gates and enter the building? Did they have the
right to? Random dregs. It was not, let's say, they were some kind of
officials, dregs, who freely passed and entered the hall. Was it to
happen? It was a very delicate and organized work." Ms. Demirchyan has
no doubts that Nairi Hunanyan's murdering weapons were entered into
the Parliament House in advance. "How could they pass them through
so many people? So, either the guards were their supporters or the
weapons were not passed through into the building like that, they
was passed before. As to who has organized it, it is difficult to say.
It's difficult, because there are such issues, including the
geopolitical redistribution. External forces also played a role here,
but it was done by the hands of Armenians. This is the most painful
part." Rima Demirchyan confirmed the testimony of Anahit Bakhshyan
that Gagik Jhangiryan had said, my hands are tied, they do not let
me work. "He has said the same to us. But why are they tied up? Let
him function. This case cannot stay unrevealed, it is disclosed."
Hripsime JEBEJYAN
Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2013/10/04/161884/
From: A. Papazian