Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Response To E. Azadian's 'Anarchy In The Hierarchy'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Response To E. Azadian's 'Anarchy In The Hierarchy'

    RESPONSE TO E. AZADIAN'S 'ANARCHY IN THE HIERARCHY'

    17 September 2013

    I have read Mr. Azadian's above inappropriately titled article. The
    author has injected poisonous nonsense into the debate about the
    governance of the Armenian Apostolic Orthodox Church by circumventing
    all the serious issues and resorting to fatally-flawed cliches. In
    a stampede to retrieve the situation, Mr. Azadian has pushed all the
    wrong and worn out arguments - the Genocide, 'Cold War' sentiments,
    and the Antelias-Etchmiadzin crisis.

    The reason why the Armenian people have raised their voices is because
    the only unifying institution based on moral foundations is being
    governed by the Catholicos, and not by the Episcopal Synod according
    to the long held canons of the church. The hierarchy of the Church
    is not the soul of the Armenian people. The soul of the Armenian
    nation is its Church, Holy, Apostolic and Orthodox, upon which the
    hierarchies of Holy Etchmiadzin, Cilicia/Antelias, Jerusalem and
    Constantinople/Istanbul were founded on to protect and preserve
    "without blemish in spiritual love and one accord".

    The Patriarchate of Jerusalem and its Brotherhood have been a principal
    source of our faith for nearly 1,500 years. Over the centuries,
    countless Armenians have made pilgrimages to the Holy City, prayed
    and renewed their Christian vows on the shrine of St James, Brother of
    Our Lord. During the most critical times in the history of our Church
    the noble clergy (Patriarchs Yeghishe Turian, Torkom Koushagian,
    Guregh Israelian) have kept the flame of St. Gregory's lantern alight.

    When the late locum tenens of the Catholicosate of Etchmiadzin, the
    Patriarch of Jerusalem Torkom Manoogian passed away, the Catholicos
    did not attend his funeral. Failure to attend was disrespectful to the
    members of the Jerusalem Brotherhood, who hold high and responsible
    positions in the west. He also failed to attend the enthronement of
    Nourhan Manougian the present Patriarch of Jerusalem. The latter needs
    the visible support of Holy Etchmiadzin. His absence also diminished
    the status of the Patriarchate in the eyes of the hostile Israeli
    government.

    His Grace Archbishop Mesrop Moutafian, Patriarch of Constantinople
    succumbed to his present state due to his spending several years in
    prison for his stance against the Turkish government, and not because
    of being a "political tool in the hands of" that government as Azadian
    alleges. Likewise, the antagonism of the Israeli government toward
    the Patriarch of Jerusalem arises from the courageous stance he has
    taken on the question of the Armenian Genocide.

    There is no tradition of a newly- elected Patriarch of Jerusalem making
    a pilgrimage to Holy Etchmiadzin to renew his vows at the throne of
    St Gregory, as Mr. Azadian suggests. The Patriarch takes and renews
    his vows at the shrine of the Apostle St. James, Brother of Our Lord.

    No serious observer believes that the survival of an individual
    is much more important than the integrity of our Church, the oldest
    institution of the Armenian nation. The cavalier approach of Karekin II
    is unraveling and the conspiracy theories expounded by Mr. Azadian to
    defend the Catholicos are disingenuous. There is obvious cronyism on
    the part of Mr. Azadian, a lifelong beneficiary of the organization
    he represents who defends his patron and ally rather than heed the
    cry of the people, who for the first time, after 75 years, have come
    together in defense of their Mother Church.

    Political conformity has for long been the cause of ill-health for the
    Armenian Church. Even before the Russian Revolution, the Church and
    the State in Armenia existed in a sort of unified harmony, which was
    not always pleasing to the church. After the Revolution, the Church
    fell silent. During the time of repression and extreme persecution
    nobody expressed political views. To start to think politically,
    and to speak of politics from within the Church, will require a long
    and deep period of learning. The Church cannot belong to one party
    or another. It must be the voice of conscience, permeated with the
    light of God. Ideally, the Church must be in a position to speak for
    every party, for every point of view, to say, 'this is worthy of Man
    and God, and this is not worthy of Man and God'.

    It is not the Catholicos who imparts prestige and authority to the
    Catholicosate. But the Catholicosate, with its 1,700 years of heritage
    and 131 Catholicoi, whose witness has been tested by sweat and blood
    that imparts authority and prestige to the Holy See. It is the sacred
    oath of every new Catholicos to uphold and enrich that heritage.

    http://www.keghart.com/Rev-Nersessian-Response

    Rev. Dr. V. Nerses Nersessian, London UK, 17 September 2013

    [email protected]




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X