Tweet
WHO PAYS ICG FOR FORECASTING NEW WAR IN KARABAKH?
September 27, 2013 - 15:32 AMT
PanARMENIAN.Net - A well known International Crisis Group issued yet
another analysis on the Karabakh conflict. As usual, the pessimistic
ICG forecasts resumption of a war, escalation of tensions, however,
being untruthful in an attempt to preserve the appearance of
objectivity.
In its overview titled Armenia and Azerbaijan: A Season of Risks,
the group predicts that "should a full-scale conflict between Armenia
and Azerbaijan break out again, some or all of the regional powers -
Russia, Turkey and Iran - could be drawn in, directly."
"Vigorous international engagement is needed to lessen chances of
violent escalation during coming weeks and months," the Group believes,
setting hopes on Russia: "Russia, which is highly influential in
all aspects of the conflict and would be the most directly affected
of the Minsk co-chairs by a new war, should act more decisively to
broker an agreement. It could advance this by announcing a suspension
of arms supplies to both sides."
Now, about being untruthful. In its analysis, the Group says. "Peace
talks on Nagorno-Karabakh bogged down in 2011, accelerating an arms
race and intensifying strident rhetoric. Terms like "Blitzkrieg'~R,
"pre-emptive strike'~R and '~Qtotal war" have gained currency with
both sides' planners."
The truth is, Armenian side does not engage in military rhetoric, the
latter being Azerbaijan's "privilege," with the country's leadership
missing no chance to express their aggressive moods. Armenia's
"strident rhetoric" is limited to mere expressions of readiness to
resist Azeri attacks.
Same with "accelerating an arms race." Baku is the one overtly
purchasing and manufacturing inordinate amounts of weaponry, in
violation of all international quotas to compensate for lack of
expertise in its army, which has already been defeated once.
But back to the analysis. "An immediate concern is military
miscalculation, with implications that could far exceed those of
a localized post-Soviet frozen conflict, as the South Caucasus, a
region where big powers meet and compete, is now also a major energy
corridor. Clashes increasingly occur along the Azerbaijani-Armenian
frontier far from Nagorno Karabakh, the conflict's original focus,"
the analysis says.
Now what the analysis dubs as "clashes" are incessant Azeri-staged
provocations, with Baku sinking as low as shelling Armenian villages
or preventing a doctor from aiding a person blown up on a mine who
later bled to death, as they did only recently.
As the analysis notes, "the possibility of internal political unrest
in both countries increases the uncertainty. Unrest at home might
tempt leaders to deflect attention by raising military tensions or to
embark on risky attempts to capitalize on their adversary's troubles."
Last year, Sabine Freizer, Director of the European Programs in the
International Crisis Group gave yet another prediction of an oncoming
war in Karabakh.
"Armenian -Azerbaijani clashes may grow into a war in the region,
where BP Company and its partners invested USD 35 billion in energy
projects. Both parties to the conflict maintain weak control of the
line of contact. Large-scale hostilities may soon erupt by accident,
as a consequence of retaliatory measures taken," she said.
Probably reluctant to seem Cassandra-like and be slammed by Yerevan
or Baku, Sabine Freizer hurried to add, "Neither Azerbaijan, nor
Armenia intend to wage large-scale offensive in short terms. In
case of renewal of hostilities, the war will by protracted due to
militarily parity of the sides. Besides, the security guarantees
issued by Russia and Turkey may get them involved," she said, adding
that Russia's military base in Gyumri may extend Armenia assistance,
with both countries being CSTO member-states and Azerbaijan having
close ethnic, political and economic ties with Turkey.
Luckily, Freizer's predictions failed to come true, similarly to
previous analysis-based forecasts of the ICG. The question is, who pays
the Group to issue somber predictions and escalate the tension over
the issue? Because the only thing the ICG managed to achieve throughout
the years is become resented - both in Armenia and Azerbaijan.
Marina Ananikyan/ PanARMENIAN.Net
http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/170539/Who_pays_ICG_for_forecasting_new_war_in_Karabakh
September 27, 2013 - 15:32 AMT
PanARMENIAN.Net - A well known International Crisis Group issued yet
another analysis on the Karabakh conflict. As usual, the pessimistic
ICG forecasts resumption of a war, escalation of tensions, however,
being untruthful in an attempt to preserve the appearance of
objectivity.
In its overview titled Armenia and Azerbaijan: A Season of Risks,
the group predicts that "should a full-scale conflict between Armenia
and Azerbaijan break out again, some or all of the regional powers -
Russia, Turkey and Iran - could be drawn in, directly."
"Vigorous international engagement is needed to lessen chances of
violent escalation during coming weeks and months," the Group believes,
setting hopes on Russia: "Russia, which is highly influential in
all aspects of the conflict and would be the most directly affected
of the Minsk co-chairs by a new war, should act more decisively to
broker an agreement. It could advance this by announcing a suspension
of arms supplies to both sides."
Now, about being untruthful. In its analysis, the Group says. "Peace
talks on Nagorno-Karabakh bogged down in 2011, accelerating an arms
race and intensifying strident rhetoric. Terms like "Blitzkrieg'~R,
"pre-emptive strike'~R and '~Qtotal war" have gained currency with
both sides' planners."
The truth is, Armenian side does not engage in military rhetoric, the
latter being Azerbaijan's "privilege," with the country's leadership
missing no chance to express their aggressive moods. Armenia's
"strident rhetoric" is limited to mere expressions of readiness to
resist Azeri attacks.
Same with "accelerating an arms race." Baku is the one overtly
purchasing and manufacturing inordinate amounts of weaponry, in
violation of all international quotas to compensate for lack of
expertise in its army, which has already been defeated once.
But back to the analysis. "An immediate concern is military
miscalculation, with implications that could far exceed those of
a localized post-Soviet frozen conflict, as the South Caucasus, a
region where big powers meet and compete, is now also a major energy
corridor. Clashes increasingly occur along the Azerbaijani-Armenian
frontier far from Nagorno Karabakh, the conflict's original focus,"
the analysis says.
Now what the analysis dubs as "clashes" are incessant Azeri-staged
provocations, with Baku sinking as low as shelling Armenian villages
or preventing a doctor from aiding a person blown up on a mine who
later bled to death, as they did only recently.
As the analysis notes, "the possibility of internal political unrest
in both countries increases the uncertainty. Unrest at home might
tempt leaders to deflect attention by raising military tensions or to
embark on risky attempts to capitalize on their adversary's troubles."
Last year, Sabine Freizer, Director of the European Programs in the
International Crisis Group gave yet another prediction of an oncoming
war in Karabakh.
"Armenian -Azerbaijani clashes may grow into a war in the region,
where BP Company and its partners invested USD 35 billion in energy
projects. Both parties to the conflict maintain weak control of the
line of contact. Large-scale hostilities may soon erupt by accident,
as a consequence of retaliatory measures taken," she said.
Probably reluctant to seem Cassandra-like and be slammed by Yerevan
or Baku, Sabine Freizer hurried to add, "Neither Azerbaijan, nor
Armenia intend to wage large-scale offensive in short terms. In
case of renewal of hostilities, the war will by protracted due to
militarily parity of the sides. Besides, the security guarantees
issued by Russia and Turkey may get them involved," she said, adding
that Russia's military base in Gyumri may extend Armenia assistance,
with both countries being CSTO member-states and Azerbaijan having
close ethnic, political and economic ties with Turkey.
Luckily, Freizer's predictions failed to come true, similarly to
previous analysis-based forecasts of the ICG. The question is, who pays
the Group to issue somber predictions and escalate the tension over
the issue? Because the only thing the ICG managed to achieve throughout
the years is become resented - both in Armenia and Azerbaijan.
Marina Ananikyan/ PanARMENIAN.Net
http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/170539/Who_pays_ICG_for_forecasting_new_war_in_Karabakh