Tweet
ARMENIA'S 13TH CONFIDENTIAL POINT
Haikazn Ghahriyan, Editor-in-Chief
Comments - Tuesday, 03 June 2014, 18:28
It has become known that the four non-governmental parties have drafted
12 recommendations to the government, and if their recommendations
are not carried out, they may hold a joint rally in autumn. The
recommendations concern domestic policy, particularly transition to
a proportional system of election. According to the four parties,
the recommendations are aimed at fundamental change in the country.
In Armenia the domestic policy, as is said, is a "broad notion". In the
result of developments that followed September 3, this is not even a
"domestic policy" because the domestic issues become "supranational"
under different Armenian-Russian deals and the upcoming Eurasian
treaty.
In other words, Armenia has delegated the right to decision making
to Moscow, and certainly the problems will be distributed by priority.
Moscow announced, for example, that it will interfere whenever it is
deemed contradicting to its heart and soul.
It should be noted that the four parties did not oppose, even
participated in the creation of the current state of affairs
when Armenia entered into the Eurasian process and ended up in
colonization. Moreover, the issue of "change of government" was
postponed due to this.
In this situation it is important to find out which of these 12
recommendations will not contradict the "heart and soul" of Moscow.
Can a colonized country conduct a sovereign domestic policy aimed
at fundamental change? Where is the limit of "domestic sovereignty"
of a colonized country? In this respect, one can refer to the times
of the Soviet Union.
Do the four parties have to adjust their recommendations to this
situation to make sure they do not contradict the concept and spirit
of Eurasian integration of Armenia and stay within its limits? In
other words, a domestic policy is actually possible. If certainly
the priorities of the political class of Armenia do not include fight
for sovereignty and renouncement of humiliating deals.
One may insist that first it is necessary to carry out fundamental
changes to be able to resolve the problem. It is possible considering
the present "guerilla times".
In any case, the most important and confidential 13th point remains
valid for the political class of Armenia, namely they shall not
anger Putin.
- See more at:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/32534#sthash.dE69glNk.dpuf
Haikazn Ghahriyan, Editor-in-Chief
Comments - Tuesday, 03 June 2014, 18:28
It has become known that the four non-governmental parties have drafted
12 recommendations to the government, and if their recommendations
are not carried out, they may hold a joint rally in autumn. The
recommendations concern domestic policy, particularly transition to
a proportional system of election. According to the four parties,
the recommendations are aimed at fundamental change in the country.
In Armenia the domestic policy, as is said, is a "broad notion". In the
result of developments that followed September 3, this is not even a
"domestic policy" because the domestic issues become "supranational"
under different Armenian-Russian deals and the upcoming Eurasian
treaty.
In other words, Armenia has delegated the right to decision making
to Moscow, and certainly the problems will be distributed by priority.
Moscow announced, for example, that it will interfere whenever it is
deemed contradicting to its heart and soul.
It should be noted that the four parties did not oppose, even
participated in the creation of the current state of affairs
when Armenia entered into the Eurasian process and ended up in
colonization. Moreover, the issue of "change of government" was
postponed due to this.
In this situation it is important to find out which of these 12
recommendations will not contradict the "heart and soul" of Moscow.
Can a colonized country conduct a sovereign domestic policy aimed
at fundamental change? Where is the limit of "domestic sovereignty"
of a colonized country? In this respect, one can refer to the times
of the Soviet Union.
Do the four parties have to adjust their recommendations to this
situation to make sure they do not contradict the concept and spirit
of Eurasian integration of Armenia and stay within its limits? In
other words, a domestic policy is actually possible. If certainly
the priorities of the political class of Armenia do not include fight
for sovereignty and renouncement of humiliating deals.
One may insist that first it is necessary to carry out fundamental
changes to be able to resolve the problem. It is possible considering
the present "guerilla times".
In any case, the most important and confidential 13th point remains
valid for the political class of Armenia, namely they shall not
anger Putin.
- See more at:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/32534#sthash.dE69glNk.dpuf